Rendered at 12:00:09 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) with Cloudflare Workers.
pjc50 3 hours ago [-]
Personally I think governments shouldn't just be able to order people killed, but that's just a European view.
(really the difference between the constitutional law approach which only protects US citizens and the human rights approach of ECHR which protects humans)
I mean we all knew the US is bombing innocent fisher man outside their jurisdiction. That is exactly what central European media seemed to agree on.
We still miss the "why" and how there are no consequences so far
davikr 46 minutes ago [-]
My fishermen also ride around in speedboats rocking $120,000 worth of engines filled to the brim with mysterious blue packages.
defrost 9 minutes ago [-]
Yours might, these fisherman did not:
The eight missing Ecuadorian nationals were aboard a 52-foot longline fishing boat called the Fiorella. The men on two boats that were struck in March, the Negra Francisca Duarte II and the Don Maca, all survived.
herbst 21 minutes ago [-]
Cool fisherman you have there. Guess that's more than enough reason to just bomb them.
I do not claim to understand american logic. I don't want to either.
Sha1rholder 2 hours ago [-]
Frogs being boiled—public has gotten used to it, even numb.
vrganj 1 hours ago [-]
Why did Russia complain about the rights of the Russian minority in Ukraine?
Why did Austria send Serbia an Ultimatum in 1914?
Why did Japanese officers blow up their own railway in Manchuria in 1931?
Why was Spain blamed for an accidental explosion on the USS Maine in 1898?
fragmede 2 hours ago [-]
But what if that fisherman possibly thought about the existence of illegal narcotics while on the boat, fishing? That's grounds for getting murdered, right?
herbst 22 minutes ago [-]
Is it? Where I am from you don't get murdered for anything usually.
I know little about American customs tho
codedokode 1 hours ago [-]
What if a son of a senator or a president had drugs, would he be bombed too?
(really the difference between the constitutional law approach which only protects US citizens and the human rights approach of ECHR which protects humans)
We still miss the "why" and how there are no consequences so far
I do not claim to understand american logic. I don't want to either.
Why did Austria send Serbia an Ultimatum in 1914?
Why did Japanese officers blow up their own railway in Manchuria in 1931?
Why was Spain blamed for an accidental explosion on the USS Maine in 1898?
I know little about American customs tho